Tobias Bieniek
Tobias Bieniek
@carols10cents did you mean to say "Allow deletion of crate **versions**"? At least that is what I would expect đ
yes, that would be the consequence :)
they're also showing up on https://github.com/mpalmer/service-skeleton#usage, which is what we're roughly trying to match. these lines are only hidden on docs output.
I generally support the goals of this RFC, but I agree with the previous commenters that we would need some way to discourage including huge resources in the crate tarballs....
@JakeWharton could you have a look at this fantastic contribution and possibly merge it?
FWIW I've packaged this branch up and it's available for public use at https://jitpack.io/#Turbo87/hugo/1.2.2 I've also just tested this on a mixed Java and Kotlin Android app and it seems...
we're slowly working towards a state of the code where we should be able to increase the width without too many issues :)
@ibaryshnikov yes, see https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/issues/3687#issuecomment-857418731 for example đ
for future reference, this got implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/pull/1248, but was only added to the index there, but not to our database. we would need to add a new column to...
this appears to be a duplicate of https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/issues/326. thanks for sharing your thoughts though :)