chifra scrape: non-archive and non-tracing nodes support is gone

[dszlachta]

It seems like support for non-archive and non-tracing nodes got lost in translation while moving code to Go. If this is correct, we should decide to either bring it back or inform the users that such nodes are no longer supported. Issues spotted:

1. The new scraper (Go) assumes that tracing is on. There is no single mention of anything like isArchiveNode or isTracingNode in blaze.go: https://github.com/TrueBlocks/trueblocks-core/blob/develop/src/apps/chifra/internal/scrape/blaze.go
2. Go version of isTracingNode always returns true. It looks like a mock got merged into develop: https://github.com/TrueBlocks/trueblocks-core/blob/c0fbc744d51e6a6935f133f89ec50f800af27f5c/src/apps/chifra/pkg/rpcClient/client.go#L228
3. Setting archive=false and using non-archive node will make blockScrape exit: https://github.com/TrueBlocks/trueblocks-core/blob/develop/src/apps/blockScrape/options.cpp#L98

[tjayrush]

It seems like support for non-archive and non-tracing nodes got lost in translation while moving code to Go. If this is correct, we should decide to either bring it back or inform the users that such nodes are no longer supported.

It never was properly supported, even in the C++ code. It was only theoretically possible, but never a priority.

We should fix the messaging and fail more gracefully.

[tjayrush]

This is related: https://github.com/TrueBlocks/trueblocks-core/issues/2111

[tjayrush]

This is so freaking old it's the same as not even existing...