Rich Trott
Rich Trott
Since this is dependent on another PR, I'm going to put it into draft mode so no one merges it prematurely.
To clarify: If I'm not mistaken, all of social media management for Node.js is now in the hands of the Foundation and it is up to them to indicate what...
@nodejs/moderation
@rginn @bensternthal
Is this a change in CODEOWNERS and an understanding within the project of who "owns" the doc and doc tooling? Or is there more to it than that?
> https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/main/doc is a little too broad, as it contains stuff like https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/main/doc/contributing which contains policy docs and the like. Maybe scope the folders to the ones that contain the...
Will our CODEOWNERS/github-bot tooling work if `doc/api` is owned by the website team but `doc/api/http.md` is owned by the http team and so on?
Oh, yeah, +1 to ownership of `doc/api_assets` and `doc/template.html`. If it's just a CODEOWNERS change, I think you can open that as a PR immediately.
> Right, that part is the easy part. The more complicated part is that we (web infra team) would like to have ownership in the future of the publish of...