Torsten Stüber
Torsten Stüber
It seems that actually the current code on main is not correctly formatted. For that reason [I added this issue](https://github.com/pendulum-chain/pendulum/issues/477). Is it possible to revert the formatting changes in unrelated...
Okay, I appreciate your effort to try to unify the code. Then let's use it as it is now – as long as it works that way 👍.
Hey team! Please [add your planning poker estimate](https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/Pendulum-6408a0365cda59c57d39bee5/issues/pendulum-chain/pendulum/384?planning-poker) with Zenhub @b-yap @bogdanS98 @ebma @gianfra-t @TorstenStueber
Also note that there is this ticket, which we could add as well: https://github.com/pendulum-chain/spacewalk/issues/153
@prayagd Please always link to the duplicate. Which one is it?
I will open this ticket here. The other ticket is in a different repository and therefore we need separate tickets.
Hey team! Please [add your planning poker estimate](https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/Pendulum-6408a0365cda59c57d39bee5/issues/pendulum-chain/pendulum/456?planning-poker) with Zenhub @b-yap @bogdanS98 @ebma @gianfra-t
Mmhh, I did not think about this. Just thought that the version number could just be the version of the runtime. But that would not really be correct... Then it...
@prayagd I would continue to be agile and not prioritize this ticket. No urgency for this at the moment.
Yes, that would make sense.