bluetoe

bluetoe copied to clipboard

LL: No Link Layer Procedure Timeout implemented

3

This leads to the following tests failing: - LL/CON/PER/BI-05-C - LL/CON/PER/BI-07-C - LL/CON/PER/BV-51-C

TorstenRobitzki

test::radio::simulate_connection_event_response() does not take acknowledge correctly into account

1

It's possible to set any SN or NSN in the simulated received PDUs, the result will be the same. To test correct behavior for the acknowledge scheme on a higher...

TorstenRobitzki

LL: Handling Protocol Collision

1

Currently, there is no collision detection implemented. - LL/CON/PER/BV-48-C - LL/CON/PER/BV-46-C - LL/CON/PER/BV-47-C

TorstenRobitzki

Rename the white_list to filter_acceptance_list

TorstenRobitzki

LL: Overlapping LL procedures

1

What happens, when Bluetoe is currently waiting for the instance of a running LL procedure and while that time, receives a new / next procedure that has an instance?

TorstenRobitzki

While doing some very basic LL testing, there was a situation, where reproducible, the connection got lost, after an update to 2M PHY. But: This happened so far only with...

TorstenRobitzki

If a central requests update for an asymmetric PHY update, Bluetoe happily replies with both, 1M and 2M set for both, RX and TX if then the update is applied...

TorstenRobitzki

5.1.3.2: During the pause, data PDUs shall not be sent unencrypted to protect the data. Will fail: LL/SEC/PER/BV-03-C

TorstenRobitzki

Currently, invalid PDUs (be it invalid length or unknown opcode) are simply ignored. The Core spec requires an error reply. Would fail: - LL/PAC/PER/BI-01-C - LL/PAC/PER/BV-01-C

TorstenRobitzki

LL/CON/PER/BI-16-C and LL/CON/PER/BI-08-C will fail, as the requested parameters are not checked.

TorstenRobitzki