Tony Hansen
Tony Hansen
can you give an example?
AFAIK, none of the bibxml references have ever had annotations within them.
should the {2} be {2-3} (or whatever the syntax is) ? I can't find any examples right now of drafts that went over 99, but I definitely found examples of...
The old web page for xml2rfc documented the bibxml-name equivalents for all of the bibxml-# names that have been around for at least 10 years. All of the bibxml-# for...
bibxml-rfcsubseries, bibxml-ids, bibxml-misc, bibxml-w3c, bibxml-ieee, bibxml-3gpp, bibxml-nist, bibxml-iana, bibxml-doi see the complete list in #7
That'd be a good addition to the index code.
Well, they're used for _generating_ RFCs and internet drafts that lead to RFCs, so the name was considered appropriate. Also, a newer naming structure than "bibxml3" and "bibxml4" has been...
I think "find, parse, construct and return" might be required.
bibxml-nist does NOT have a corresponding number. IMO, the numbered values should be considered as aliases to the named values. That is, the standard value is the named version, and...
The original names 20-some years ago were bibxml, bibxml2 and bibxml3. When more reference databases were added, we added both symbolic names as well as numeric names, cause who could...