Zachary P Christensen

I definitely see the utility in this and it would be good help with this. I'm not completely sold on the solution because it's an all in one allocation and...

He mentions that doesn't solve the problem [here](https://github.com/SciML/ExponentialUtilities.jl/pull/84#discussion_r860157984). Elsewhere it was said that it's preferred to be a dense array and if all that's needed is a way to ensure...

I wouldn't worry about `LinearIndices`. I'll have to take a closer look at the rest of the code later tonight or tomorrow.

It would be nice if we could return `NDIndex` so that a `StaticInt` index could be preserved in iteration since it will never change. It's harder to make that work...

Maybe we shouldn't worry about forcing this to work with `CartesianIndices` and we just want our own type that functions as a more efficient replacement?

> @Tokazama Can we extend the `static_unsafe_getindex` as definition of `ArrayInterface.getindex` for ranges? It might be useful to preserve `StaticInt`. Could you give me an example of what you mean?

> > Maybe we shouldn't worry about forcing this to work with `CartesianIndices` and we just want our own type that functions as a more efficient replacement? > > So...

> > Maybe we shouldn't worry about forcing this to work with `CartesianIndices` and we just want our own type that functions as a more efficient replacement? > > So...

> > It seems like we might actually just want to replace `CartesianIndices` with this new type entirely so we don't have to hack our way around so many issues....

@wangl-cc , sorry this is moving slowly. I think everybody maintaining this package right now is trying to solve other more pressing issues right now, including myself. Hopefully we can...