ternary expressions? what operator : very good!

[jasonflorentino]

[TodePond]

?

[TodePond]

:

[jasonflorentino]

thinking that since booleans can be true, false or maybe, ternaries can evaluate either the first expression, second expression, or both! or neither. hmm

[Magnogen]

Considering ? is taken already for debugging, why not use the tilde?

condition ~? is_true ~; isnt_true ~: is_maybe

Used ; because that's "not" in DreamBerd, but tbh I'm not sure about the ~:, what about just ~~?

Could also do something like this and leave out any of the branches:

condition ~? is_true ~; isnt_true!
condition ~? is_true ~: is_maybe!
condition ~; isnt_true ~: is_maybe!

[ksdme]

May I suggest a better, more performant variant,

condition ???
    :: if_true
    ::: if_false
    :::: if_maybe

[GoldenStack]

That's great. I think DreamBerd definitely needs a quaternary operator

[ThePython10110]

If the - sign becomes completely unused (#4), that could be used.