TinCanTech
TinCanTech
@c-git Good info, thank you.
This is why you should not mess with the certificate `commonName`. However, the interactive prompt is indeed incorrect. It is disappointing that your report did not show `easytls` data.
> I'm not messing with anything, that's a base feature of easy-rsa. What is your reason to use it ?
Your use case is far from typical. You have identified the work-around, use file-name-base not `commonName`. The prompt will be corrected.
Release 3.1.5, replaced by 3.1.6 and 3.1.7, without complaint.
@ecrist are you willing to upgrade your key yet ?
@ecrist FTR: While there was some reconfiguration _under the hood_, the main difference between Easy-RSA `v3.0.8` and `v3.1.x` is support for OpenSSL `v3.x.x`, over OpenSSL `v.1.x.x`. Easy-RSA `v3.1.7` is signed...
EasyRSA is tested against `OpenSSL 1.1.1f 31 Mar 2020` and various OpenSSL version 3 binaries.
I strongly advise that debian does not pick up EasyRSA v3.2.0 It would be much better long-term to pick v3.2.1, upon its release - September 2024. If that is not...
> With a planned release for September 2024, I can easily package easy-rsa 3.2.1-1 before the next stable Debian release That is excellent news. EasyRSA v3.2.1 is intended to be...