Tim Düsterhus

> However, your version is pretty old (http://www.haproxy.org/bugs/bugs-2.2.9.html). You should upgrade first. Just FYI: This is the standard Debian package, unfortunately https://haproxy.debian.net/#?distribution=Debian&release=bullseye&version=2.2 doesn't provide any newer 2.2.x for Debian 11,...

> It would be much better and safer to switch to Vincent's release channel and that wouldn't require a branch change. Vincent doesn't offer a 2.2.x for Debian 11, that's...

Simplicity trumps spending a few minutes uselessly building the occasional commit that does nothing except adjust documentation. ~100% of commits either touch C code, regtests or the CI configuration.

@wtarreau This only has 1.9 and 2.0, but no dev and no fixed. Should 2.1, 2.2 and dev be added here?

This one still exists, but became smaller: ``` $ ./haproxy -v HAProxy version 2.5-dev7-ed8bfa-17 2021/09/16 - https://haproxy.org/ Status: development branch - not safe for use in production. Known bugs: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues?q=is:issue+is:open...

This one still exists.

After the recent fixes in #1676 I checked this once more: ``` ==150885== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==150885== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al....

> I'll leave it in a pause for a while I guess, as fixing segfaults on "bind" lines remains more important to me. Yeah, no problem. This report is low...

> Also, I'm happy to make the PR for adding the job if it's of interest. I wouldn't object to adding *a single* “all features” macOS build (or replacing the...

> `HA-Proxy version 2.2.3-0e58a34 2020/09/08 - https://haproxy.org/` @dekimsey It won't do anything about your feature request, but I'd like to note that HAProxy 2.2.3 is severely outdated: https://www.haproxy.org/bugs/bugs-2.2.3.html. The current...