Tibor Digana

In the API architecture perspective this is caled value object. That means both values `long` and `TimeUnit` cannot be safely decouled. Using `java.time.Duration` makes sense to me as this is...

@marcphilipp Not in JUnit5 but in yes JUnit4 because `org.junit.rules.Timeout` is not annotation. So this can be nice here.

@BenRomberg Multiple Rules and their order on the top of test method should not be any problem. Just keep requiring this feature. It makes sense! The Java EE has elegant...

@marcphilipp @kcooney Can add this improvement in `4.13`? This change avoids passing NULL in assertions and avoids combinations like NULL and non-NULL.

So tell us what the compiler says. I was using it without any problem.

+1

@RainerW , @digulla I am convinced you will not need any extra Rule to create. In the issue #142 you can ignore/exclude tests - by creating own Filter and run...

In this case I would create super class which has test @Rules . That's easy. You can force the devs to inherit such class in every test. You can write...

I agree that junit.properties and package level annotations are the step back. I was supporting JUnit for long time and now I maintain Surefire project. The Maven project allows me...

@stephenc Did you have spare time to establish site generation on JUnit? As far as I remember you wanted other site layout. I would like to integrate a list of...