Luuk Wester
Luuk Wester
Sure this is something that we can do. Do you have a specific API in mind that works well for you? Maybe something like ```rust cloud_storage::Client::new() .disable_auth() .base_url("whatever") // rest...
Is it important that this validation is done by cloud-storage rather than Google on their side of the API?
Yeah that is indeed a mistake. A pull request that fixes this is definitely welcome!
Hi @broccolihighkicks, sorry for the late response. This is something that can definitely be implemented. Currently, `cloud_storage` uses the ['Single request'](https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/uploading-objects#uploading-an-object) upload scheme. This would require us the switch to...
I believe that #73 would go a long way in resolving this, which I am hoping to merge soon. Is there something more you have in mind that what is...
A PR for this is definitely welcome! Feel free to submit one!
@jhgg hey, this would definitely be a welcome addition! Have you got any ideas on what a good API might look like?
About the choice between `AsyncRead` and `io::Read`: Currently the library is usable without an async runtime by using the `***_sync` methods, which are enabled by the `sync` feature flag. I...
On a side note: why do you think it is required to take both `Read` and `Seek`, wouldn't `Read` suffice?
Setting the content disposition is now fixed as of version 0.6.2.