TW
@sjuxax that was just an experiment and should not be used. real, better working MT is planned for borg 1.2. coding work on 1.2 has not started yet, we are...
@sjuxax btw, why is it *unusable* without multithreading for you?
Well, you need to consider the amount of change between backups. If it is too slow to backup the changes, yeah, then you have a problem. The total amount (as...
hmm, guess it makes more sense if you do a PR with that and I review it. And you could finish reviewing the crypto-aead stuff, so we can merge it...
btw, the branch has only few changesets with huge changes. i imagined a bit smaller steps / less risk approach.
See the milestones. Next release (1.2) will not yet have it. It's quite a lot of work to restructure borg for this, better funding would be desirable also.
No.
work on this (besides planning, experiments) has not started yet and likely some crypto stuff needs to be solved first (e.g. avoiding AES counter mode issues).
hmm, if we do that, guess we could use `chunks = [(id, size), ...]` in the files cache to work around that we do not have the `size` information in...
There is currently some work on automating asciinema videos, see PRs.