YT-Spammer-Purge
YT-Spammer-Purge copied to clipboard
Grammar Mistakes And Added Colors In Some Places
Related Issue/Addition to code
- Addition to code.
Type of change
Features And a Very Minor Fix
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Proposed Changes
- Fixes Spelling and Grammer Mistakes
- Added New Colors In headings and inputs
- Fixed Where 2 Print Statements were in the same line
Why is this change needed?
It's required because YT Spammer Purge Needs good grammar and spelling. The Second Change Is Needed So That The Terminal Looks Good And Colorful. The Fixes are So that the code runs properly.
Additional Info
- Changed Colors in Headings And Inputs
- In Scripts/auth.py line number 154. Both Prints were on the same line
Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project and I have read CONTRIBUTING.md
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
- [x] I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings
Screenshots
Original
Updated
Also I Removed The "Big Bruh Moment" As I don't think those types of words belong here. If you don't like this change I can revert it.
I’m no grammar or spelling expert, but I’m reasonably sure the change to line 616 of prepare_modes.py is incorrect. The original infers multiple “commenters”. As “commenter” is singular, the proposed change would turn the singular into singular possessive, which I’m fairly sure isn’t the required meaning.
So Should I change it back?
I’m no grammar or spelling expert, but I’m reasonably sure the change to line 616 of prepare_modes.py is incorrect. The original infers multiple “commenters”. As “commenter” is singular, the proposed change would turn the singular into singular possessive, which I’m fairly sure isn’t the required meaning.
So Should I change it back?
Yea there shouldn't be an apostrophe there
I’m no grammar or spelling expert, but I’m reasonably sure the change to line 616 of prepare_modes.py is incorrect. The original infers multiple “commenters”. As “commenter” is singular, the proposed change would turn the singular into singular possessive, which I’m fairly sure isn’t the required meaning.
So Should I change it back?
Yea there shouldn't be an apostrophe there
Ok I have changed it. Is Everything else Ok?
@ThioJoe I added a new bug fix is it ok?
@ThioJoe I added a new bug fix is it ok?
What's the bug exactly? Your code actually breaks some things, for example if there's an invalid input it just keeps the program going anyway. Probably better to revert 5a2bf9c
What's the bug exactly? Your code actually breaks some things, for example if there's an invalid input it just keeps the program going anyway. Probably better to revert 5a2bf9c
Done. Sorry for breaking the code
README.md line 88, fairly irrelevant but I don’t believe Simply and Click should be compounded.
I don't think for makes a good sentence over there.
I hope not
Is that one error going to stay that way?
Going to fix it
hey, can you assign this to me? I would like to contribute to this repo.
hey, can you assign this to me? I would like to contribute to this repo.
I don't think that the pull request can be assigned to you Lofty, FYI.
Sure.
hey is this still being worked on
Yo @Rohith0009?
Wait, are you not working on this or for some other reason?