golem
golem copied to clipboard
ThinkR-open
A Framework for Building Robust Shiny Apps
The purpose of the comments at the end of lines 16 to 23 is to help the package developer to figure out what to do. But right now, lines 18...
If you work again on an old app that has been built with an older version of `{golem}`, it could be nice to be able to "upgrade" to newest features...
```r > Sys.time() [1] "2019-11-28 21:42:52 CET" > covr::package_coverage() golem Coverage: 70.97% R/addins.R: 0.00% R/get_sysreqs.R: 0.00% R/use_files.R: 0.00% R/with_opt.R: 0.00% R/utils.R: 38.67% R/js.R: 46.67% R/config.R: 51.47% R/add_ressource_path.R: 60.00% R/reload.R: 62.86%...
[As discussed on twitter](https://twitter.com/antoine_fabri/status/1343760447846162432) : I propose to integrate the features from *{shinycheck}* into *{golem}*'s `sanity_check()`. I've worked on it already and could make half of the features work nicely...
I needed to increase my upload limit and I manage to do that in run_dev.R file, by updating the command: options(golem.app.prod = FALSE,shiny.maxRequestSize=40*1024^2) # I setup a 40 mb limit....
I really appreciate the work that has been done on `golem`. It is a life-saver for building large packages. This is a request for more documentation/examples when deploying to Shiny...
After 2 years, as much expected as Kamelott, here is finally the feature for autoreload :) Close #263 #303
+ [x] `run_dev.R` shouldn't be inside the created app but in `{golem}` itself + [x] `get_buffer()` should be renamed, and use `cat()` instead of print. Maybe try to find a...
I don't think we should keep `golem::add_ui_server_files()` inside `{golem}`. This issue is a proposal for softly deprecating it in the next release. Please comment below if you're using this function...