Jonathan White

Yes, definitely for debugging. And yes, since it's a getter now, it wont be as easy

Well you can write specifically, ` if (previousState.name!= nextState.name) ....`

> @ThinkDigitalSoftware , your example is too simple, if we have nested object it will too hard to check Unless it's not really. You're only comparing objects

Since equatable compares objects anyway, then, in the for loop (or however it's implemented) when you're comparing objects, ```dart if(obj1 == obj2){ diffMap[fieldName] = true; else { diffMap[fieldName] = false;...

@hunght > like we have state contain Post object which has array of comments, so you need to compare all the comments objects right?. so I want to see the...

@hunght it's a lot easier to create arbitrary objects in js. You can just add things to them similar to how we add entries to maps in Dart. So the...

No problem. Thank you!

Yup. It would be nice to have the choice when creating them from the intellisense when declaring final variables and from the generate constructor option as well, although that would...

I just ended up building it in myself. I just deleted enough code in the package so I could insert my own widget On Sun, Jan 20, 2019, 4:37 PM...

I'm no longer facing this issue. Anyone else still facing it?