Frans Skarman

I think we should avoid unexpected behavoiur for as long as possible. Perhaps we could have two builder structs, one basic version, and one which has a mut reference to...

Looks like the docs need some updating (reminder to myself to add a note #158). What you're looking for is the remap definitions for the timer. https://docs.rs/stm32f1xx-hal/0.5.3/stm32f1xx_hal/timer/index.html So, in your...

Changing the name does sound like a good idea, I don't really like the current `stm32` name, `device` makes a lot more sense. However, if `pac` is the agreed upon...

If nothing else, the figure in the embedded book seems to indicate that the PAC is the only layer between the microcontroller and the HAL. A wg issue sounds like...

#29 Closed this automatically but I don't think it's fixed since we didn't agree upon a name

Yea, that's true, but I feel like we should eventually decide on one of them to avoid confusion. Allthough I suppose allowing all three also has some benefits

You may be right in that it re-starts the transmission process if called multiple times, at least in some cases. I'm not familiar with Knuth's coroutines, but I see the...

This is something I've also been thinking about, but I have no idea how or if it is usually done. I have considered having one microcontroller or FPGA which would...

Hmm, interesting issue, and probably something that should be fixed. I feel like the easiest fix for it would be to disable/hide `into_alternate...`, and make the peripheral constructors themselves call...

This is something I would find useful as well! Let us know if you run into any issues if you decide to implement it!