Basic Data Types: Remove distracting reference in "strings" definition

[ghost]

Checks

• [X] This is not a duplicate of an existing issue (please have a look through our open issues list to make sure)
• [X] I have thoroughly read and understand The Odin Project Contributing Guide
• [ ] Would you like to work on this issue?

Describe your suggestion

The current strings section introduction is conformed by two paragraphs that add nothing of value to the lesson. It is an attempt at being funny that could land poorly or just be confusing for some learners, even more for those that are not native english speakers or familiar with star wars.

I think it should be replaced with a more formal definition on what strings are in Ruby, or just removed all together.

Path

Ruby / Rails

Lesson Url

https://www.theodinproject.com/lessons/ruby-basic-data-types

(Optional) Discord Name

sukairaida

(Optional) Additional Comments

No response

[KevinMulhern]

Thanks for the suggestion @sukairaida

There is a balance to be struck between being too formal/dry and injecting some light humour to keep the content more engaging. My impression is we're somewhere in the middle. But I'd like a few more opinions from learners before we action or close this.

[SumonGFC]

I remember encountering these paragraphs, and I do remember chuckling at how silly they were. Ultimately, the paragraphs add nothing to the actual lesson content and are more or less forgotten before remembered (if at all). That said, a bit of levity can help with engagement.

It is not technically necessary to restate the definition of a string since learners should already know what a string is from the foundations course, but a restatement/reminder of what they are could benefit the section.

I am in favour of keeping the first paragraph/sentence (the little rhyme) and removing the second star wars paragraph (or replacing it with a reminder of what strings are).

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has had no activity for the last 30 days.