Ludwig Magnusson

> the user can just embed a call to such a function inside her resolve/reject functions This is what I am doing right now and I really dislike it. It...

While Fluture seems much more mature and complete than our Future I wouldn't want to switch unless it has parallel execution in `ap`. And with that being said, if you...

> According to fantasyland/fantasy-land#179 a Monad's fantasy-land/ap method must execute sequentially in order to be lawful. This is bad news because from my experience, this will make the future type...

Seems to be more of an issue to raise with the specification people. Any maintainer can then choose to be lawful or not... =) Meanwhile, I will listen to this......

But I did interpret [this comment](https://github.com/fantasyland/fantasy-land/issues/203#issuecomment-262025988) as if there was a possibility of parallelism.

@SimonRichardson To clarify: I understood @davidchambers to mean that we (unfortunately) need to discuss this across many repos and maintainers since we have this problem of spread out implementations. I...

Any thoughts on this? If it looks good, can there be a merge?

@denniswebb does this mean it can be used through hub? If so, how?

Once again, this thumbed up, approved, LGTM PR is rebased and ready for merge :smile:

This issue caused problems for me too. When I found the quote below I was able to solve it. > You're right! Once you `replaceEsm` then all imports are "new"...