Benchmark comparison with Go jump

[dufferzafar]

There is a section on comparison with other such utilities, but @gsamokovarov/jump seems to be missing. It's written in Go and also has some fuzzy matching. It would be nice to see how z.lua compares with that.

[skywind3000]

if you wish:

skywind@weilin0:~/.local/etc$ time _zlua --add /tmp

real    0m0.024s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.031s
skywind@weilin0:~/.local/etc$ time _zlua --add /tmp

real    0m0.027s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.000s
skywind@weilin0:~/.local/etc$ time _zlua --add /tmp

real    0m0.023s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.000s
skywind@weilin0:~/.local/etc$ time jump chdir

real    0m0.029s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.016s
skywind@weilin0:~/.local/etc$ time jump chdir

real    0m0.026s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.000s
skywind@weilin0:~/.local/etc$ time jump chdir

real    0m0.034s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.000s

I found that jump chdir is the database updating command, it will save the current working directory in the history database.

[skywind3000]

skywind@weilin0:~/.local/etc$ ls -lh ~/go/bin/jump
-rwxr-xr-x 1 skywind skywind 3.5M Feb  7 22:40 /home/skywind/go/bin/jump
skywind@weilin0:~/.local/etc$ ls -lh /usr/bin/lua5.3
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 228K Dec 19  2016 /usr/bin/lua5.3

Maybe the executable file size is the reason ??