Fixed: #12233

[vedprakash226]

I have added a logic that restricts the evaluation of log function if y_true is 0.

• [x] Add an algorithm?
• [x] Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
• [ ] Add or change doctests? -- Note: Please avoid changing both code and tests in a single pull request.
• [ ] Documentation change?

Checklist:

• [x] I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
• [x] This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
• [x] I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
• [x] This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
• [x] All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
• [x] All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
• [x] All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
• [x] All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
• [x] All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
• [x] All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
• [x] If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #12233

[kevin1kevin1k]

• Note that y_true is an array so comparing it to 0 might not be a good idea here, and there are nonzero entries that should be calculated instead of just returning 0.
• I think this is a duplicate of #12237

[kevin1kevin1k]

@anandfresh I do not think the PR should be approved as it is not correct and do not resolve what the issue intends.

[anandfresh]

@anandfresh I do not think the PR should be approved as it is not correct and do not resolve what the issue intends.

@kevin1kevin1k - Yes, my bad ! I didn't see it is an array variable . Ideally he has to check if the array length is greater than 0

[cclauss]

Closing tests_are_failing PRs to prepare for Hacktoberfest