Juha Jeronen

There's also a nice example of point 6 in [Peter Seibel's Practical Common Lisp, chapter 9: Building a Unit Test Framework](http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/practical-building-a-unit-test-framework.html).

Ping? This is a straightforward bugfix, so I'd like to get it into the official version of macropy3, if possible. :)

Now that I noticed the conflicts alert, it seems you already fixed this - in exactly the same way as I did - in 9cac7df. ;) But I suppose I...

Sure, I'll add a test for this too. Since I originally posted this PR, I've discovered that my fix still doesn't handle the fully general case correctly, but I haven't...

Here's a test for the basic case for two block macros in the same ``with``, where both macros operate only in the second pass. I think the more complex cases...

Ping? Need more complex test cases, or is this fine now?

Wow. `unpythonic.syntax` and its 25 now obsoleted and deleted lines thank you! :) The savings are 2-3 lines per macro; this is a nice improvement to readability. See https://github.com/Technologicat/unpythonic/commit/31106ee298de690e74c9fd6c4940d97d645f7b86 One...

> Yes, I'm still thinking about *args and **kwargs.... do not take that signature as written in the stone ;-) I think this solution is pretty good, but if you...

Just commenting, this is really useful, I have been using ``.transform`` all over ``unpythonic.syntax``. Even better would be if it was possible for a macro to just expand into another...

Ah, very good point. I did my testing in the context of `unpythonic`, so I sort of forgot to add tests for this to MacroPy itself. Yes, after discussion is...