Guillaume P.

Results 140 comments of Guillaume P.

I close this MR as there is no activity.

Sorry. I don't want a regression, and there is one. Also, I'm quite anxious at this PR as this is a big library change, and it might cause a behavior...

Thanks for the clear report.

By default, there is no about, but doc comment are `about`, so the workaround would be no doc comment on these structs.

I've put a link to your workaround in the description of the issue for ease of access.

Some thought: * that's a bit specific, but nothing wrong in integrating it. * the code is very difficult to understand, I tried 2 times during 10 minutes without success....

* I'm not sure an pinned issue would change anything * Not sure that's rustsec job, there is no vulerability known in clap v2 for a long time, so no...

This issue is now pinned, not sure it will change anything, but that's free :-)

Because of rust macro system constraint, we can't put `