Lee Belbin

Agreed, but again, "https://epsg.io/" in References?

I've added "4326"

Added to Notes: "This test will fail if there are leading or trailing white space or non-printing characters."

This is a 'test' where we reference bdq:sourceAuthority under INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET but then use "is a valid EPSG CRS Code (with or without the "epsg" namespace prepended), or an unambiguous alphanumeric...

Agreed and done

Changed Expected Response (and Specification Last Updated) from EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available, INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:geodeticDatum is EMPTY; COMPLIANT if the value of dwc:geodeticDatum is a valid EPSG...

Changed Expected Response from EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available, INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:geodeticDatum is EMPTY; COMPLIANT if the value of dwc:geodeticDatum is a valid EPSG CRS or Datum code...

Splitting bdqffdq:Information Elements into "Information Elements ActedUpon" and "Information Elements Consulted". Also changed "Field" to "TestField" and "Output Type" to "TestType".

Changed Source Authority from bdq:sourceAuthority = "EPSG" {[https://epsg.org]} {API for EPSG codes [https://apps.epsg.org/api/swagger/ui/index#/Datum]} to bdq:sourceAuthority default = "GBIF GeodeticDatum Vocabulary" [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/GeodeticDatum]} {"dwc:lifeStage vocabulary API" [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/GeodeticDatum/concepts]}

Reverted to EPSG