Lee Belbin

Splitting bdqffdq:Information Elements into "Information Elements ActedUpon" and "Information Elements Consulted". Also changed "Field" to "TestField", "Output Type" to "TestType" and updated "Specification Last Updated"

Why did I put NOT_CORE? It seems a simple easy to test and useful FLAG right now. As a VALIDATION, it would also add meaningfully to #135 but it also...

This relates to an existing ALA test of the type we would call NOTIFICATION that says "occurrence status is empty so we are assuming "present". This still seems like a...

Replied in last email. We need it to justify the amendment On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:07 AM Arthur Chapman wrote: > I believe this is a VALIDATION not...

Splitting bdqffdq:Information Elements into "Information Elements ActedUpon" and "Information Elements Consulted". Also changed "Field" to "TestField", "Output Type" to "TestType" and updated "Specification Last Updated"

I agree with SUPPLEMENTAL for the same reasons as for dwc:day

In the light of recent comments, I have this to Notes, but feel free to edit: "We make the assumption that interpretable Roman numerals in dwc:month are valid as some...

I have edited the Notes to "Implementations should translate interpretable Roman numerals in the range I-XII in dwc:month as integer month values 1-12, as some natural science domains use roman...

Splitting bdqffdq:Information Elements into "Information Elements ActedUpon" and "Information Elements Consulted". Also changed "Field" to "TestField", "Output Type" to "TestType" and updated "Specification Last Updated"

I have updated the specs for this test (Source Authority) by taking the ref in the Notes (updated by References) to the Source Authority. To me, this conflicts with for...