form docs(angular): use type annotations instead of casting

Following some remarks from twitter, and as discussed in the maintainers channel we should avoid casting in the docs. This pr removes the casting defaultValues in examples and docs.

Apr 20 '25 19:04 harry-whorlow

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit bf1186c3af8f3fd340e19f3de58e34d158c85805.

Command	Status	Duration	Result
`nx affected --targets=test:sherif,test:knip,tes...`	✅ Succeeded	1m 6s	View ↗
`nx run-many --target=build --exclude=examples/**`	✅ Succeeded	<1s	View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-05-25 18:07:27 UTC

Apr 20 '25 19:04 nx-cloud[bot]

More templates

@tanstack/angular-form

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@tanstack/angular-form@1433

@tanstack/form-core

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@tanstack/form-core@1433

@tanstack/react-form

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@tanstack/react-form@1433

@tanstack/lit-form

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@tanstack/lit-form@1433

@tanstack/solid-form

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@tanstack/solid-form@1433

@tanstack/svelte-form

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@tanstack/svelte-form@1433

@tanstack/vue-form

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@tanstack/vue-form@1433

commit: bf1186c

Apr 20 '25 19:04 pkg-pr-new[bot]

Ahh, sorry @harry-whorlow for not catching this prior to a closed PR. I'm in favor of type annotations; what does casting bring to us otherwise?

May 16 '25 14:05 crutchcorn

@crutchcorn It wasn't so much as me closing it in favour of casting, I'm for annotations too, I just didn’t want to bother the other maintainers with it for now 🙂

But, I can reopen it

May 16 '25 15:05 harry-whorlow

Closing this as I don't see the arguments for it much. Just trying to clean up our PRs

Dec 01 '25 09:12 crutchcorn