Ted Thibodeau Jr

This is still a dupe of #553, where I already [noted](https://github.com/w3c/did-spec-registries/pull/553#pullrequestreview-1960945573) that hostname `mq.q-net.or.kr` does not resolve.

This could be one or more links to external documentation. My concerns are about people who don't have experience or education at the level of most of those involved in...

Might I suggest that this be reworked/rewritten a bit, to more closely mimic the [HTTP content negotiation `accept:` header](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Headers/Accept), such that each entry pairs a protocol (with associated priority) with...

To ease future review of this report, and action thereon, output of the verifier follows: ----- error Line: 5644 https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/payment-services-psd-2-directive-eu-2015-2366_en redirected to https://commission.europa.eu/law/payment-services-psd-2-directive-eu-2015-2366_en Status: 301 -> 404 Not Found The...

Based on recent feedback from the TAG (for whom I believe the explainer to be primarily intended, based on their own prior requests) in other WGs, it would be better...

@simoneonofri — I suggest moving the draft from the wiki, which is surprisingly difficult to edit (e.g., I have no edit link), to either a distinct fork, or a PR...

When the time comes to add this to the body of the document... A Glossary appendix can work well, or a Glossary section near the start. If presented with a...

`s/self reveiw/self review` in issue title

It might be worth changing `Remote DID Resolver` and `Local DID Resolver` to `Resolver of Remote DIDs` and `Resolver of Local DIDs`, respectively (or offering the latter as alternatives), so...

> This parameter is non-normative. I don't know what this was meant to say. The *description* of this parameter might be non-normative, in which case, yes, the normative RFC2119 language...