ken

Add a test to verify this concurrent case and the fix. PTAL, thanks. @codelipenghui @eolivelli @lhotari @poorbarcode

@poorbarcode @codelipenghui It seems this problem is not fixed in the master branch.

#22283 has fixed the same problem. Close this pr.

> I agree that we should align the default with the Java client > > can you please add a test case ? > > This is breaking behaviour change,...

> Hi, @TakaHiR07 is there any chance to resolve the conflicts? @BewareMyPower done.

I revert the pr change and this test "testHasMessageAvailableAfterSeekToEnd" still fail. It seems this pr is not the reason