Andrea Pappacoda
Andrea Pappacoda
This isn't a bug, but a feature request. Therefore it should be kept open to track the feature request, or closed as wontfix. There's no reason to mark this as...
Hi @trixirt, pinging you too as you are the maintainer of the xbyak package on Fedora. What are your opinions on this? On Wed Aug 28, 2024 at 2:43 AM...
Interesting, what issue have you incountered? Looking at the Git history of Fedora packaging, you've skipped 7.06, which is where these arch-independent changes got introduced in the first place. Hence...
Also, to avoid the issue keszybz has encountered, you should not mark xbyak as noarch, but should use rpm's equivalent of dpkg's "any".
Is this guaranteed to work? What if Cflags.private get passed after Cflags?
Eh, sorry, I obviously meant before, not after. Is it documented pkg-config behaviour that we could rely on? If yes, neat solution!
Il giorno ven 28 feb 2025 alle 14:05:34 -08:00:00, Miloš Komarčević ***@***.***> ha scritto: > Cflags.private is not a documented feature, and is AFAIK only > implemented (and in this...
This has been fixed, as v1.4.0 has been tagged:
Hi Duncan, yeah, I'm aware of those issues and I have attempted fixing them in https://github.com/pistacheio/pistache/pull/1188, but it's far from trivial. Lcov 2.0 introduced some changes that make it incompatible...
I've disabled the Coverage step for debian:testing runners in aa2a9f25b64000bd0470c8fd7643c4640b9cdf8f, but I'll keep this issue open to track the actual issue.