Róbert Papp
Róbert Papp
Would you accept contribution for a binary parser?
@sandwwraith Re ["Feature modes"](https://github.com/Kotlin/KEEP/blob/underscore-for-unused-local/proposals/unused-return-value-checker.md#feature-modes), I think there's a gap in the mode listing. What happens if a library *never* re-compiles (or takes unreasonably long, like years) with `@MustUseReturnValue`? I think...
Related #845 ?
You might be interested in https://gradle.com/training/gradle-9-is-coming-whats-in-it-for-developers/
> ensure it is greater than 0 Should this be `>= 0`? because `0` means I want to allow no errors. Having `> 0` would force everyone to accept 1...
I think ignoring with placeholders is not in line with the rule's intent. In the OP example there are already two createX and createY functions with the same body, so...
Obligatory related link: https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html Bumping to 1.4 wouldn't give you any benefit really, the decision should be made whether you want to support Gradle 5.x and 6.x. Bumping Kotlin support...
Nice! Exactly what I meant by "the decision should be made whether you want to support Gradle 5.x and 6.x".
I think it's fine, I would wait for Kotlin 1.9 or 2.0, and until Gradle updates to those. Until then there's no real push, unless you really want to use...
Hmm... https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/25868