dgp version

[jiaqixuac]

Hi,

Can you provide which dpg version you used for development? It seems many compatibility issues with dgp 1.0.

[VitorGuizilini-TRI]

Apparently there were some updates to the public DGP repository that broke compatibility, we apologize for that. Can you try this commit? 9617e65ad351558636de5586a48db848eab578c6

[jiaqixuac]

Thank you! I will try it later.

Btw, do you have any plan to upload the codebase with the current version? I find that it's more docker-free friendly with the current dgp.

[jiaqixuac]

Thanks for the reply.

I checkout to 9617e65ad351558636de5586a48db848eab578c6 and with a few modifications, I'm able to run the train.py.

[haoweiz23]

Thanks for the reply.

I checkout to 9617e65ad351558636de5586a48db848eab578c6 and with a few modifications, I'm able to run the train.py.

@jiaqixuac Hi jiaqi, I meet the same problem now, I cannot install the dgp after checkout to the branch 9617e65ad351558636de5586a48db848eab578c6 , could you please tell me the modification you made ?

[jiaqixuac]

Hi @LionRoarRoar , are you able to install it? I just followed Dockerfile to install this package. After that, I check out to 9617e65ad351558636de5586a48db848eab578c6

[haoweiz23]

Hi @LionRoarRoar , are you able to install it? I just followed Dockerfile to install this package. After that, I check out to 9617e65ad351558636de5586a48db848eab578c6

Thank you. It works now. I installed the latest version and checkout to old version. By the way, have you visualize the depth map before? I get trouble in visualize the depth map. The gt depth map seems strange. I am looking for help but no one response still. https://github.com/TRI-ML/packnet-sfm/issues/208