Christian Kugler

``` ❯ docker exec revproxy-gen cat /proc/1/cpuset /docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e ❯ docker exec revproxy-gen cat /proc/self/cgroup 12:rdma:/ 11:cpuset:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 10:blkio:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 9:freezer:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 8:hugetlb:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 7:memory:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 6:perf_event:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 5:devices:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 4:pids:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 3:net_cls,net_prio:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 2:cpu,cpuacct:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 1:name=systemd:/docker/d8411145f6d775560b9169f5347d433a6ea32b01fb9a3903d50a98bae4a0421e 0::/system.slice/docker.service ❯ docker exec...

I saw the merge #345. Will the template need to change? Because I tried `latest` it and it's still broken: ``` ❯ doc exec revproxy-gen head -3 /etc/docker-gen/templates/nginx.tmpl {{ $CurrentContainer...

Oh, btw `.Docker.CurrentContainerID` yields the same result as `docker inspect revproxy-gen |jq '.[].Id' -r`.

Found a fix: `-only-exposed` excludes the docker-gen container from the variable `$` thus it can no longer be found by `ID`. I guess there are two options: 1. expose a...

@buchdag, I tired to test this by building from source with `make` and `docker cp`-ing the binary into my container but I have trouble getting it to work at all....

> Keep the swear words to an absolute minimum. PG13 please I cannot guarantee that. I'll try to get the most obvious ones. But to be clear, I found all...

So, I have a few more questions. - Should the following be included? - people names (I'd say no) - company names (I'd say no) - names of counties/places (yes,...

First of: Sorry, for letting this go stale. Looking through hundred-thousands of words isn't exactly fun. I believe, @BlackSagittarius, you initially contributed the 250k german words list. I was wondering...

To clarify: After removing a lot of bogus there are only about 206k words left that appear more than once in the source texts. This means that everything that follows...

Do you still happen to have the list with bogus words?