sublime_lib icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
sublime_lib copied to clipboard

Strategy for ST4

Open Thom1729 opened this issue 3 years ago • 1 comments

The current version runs on 3.3 and doesn't have any of the ST4 features. Obviously, a future version will run on 3.8 and have all of the ST4 features.

Is it worth having an intermediate version that runs on 3.3 but relies on ST4 features? The main reason I lean toward “no” is that this would effectively require two new major versions — sublime_lib 2.0 for 3.3 on ST4 and sublime_lib 3.0 for 3.8 on ST4. I'm not sure it's really worth it, but I could be persuaded.

Thom1729 avatar Apr 04 '21 15:04 Thom1729

Is it worth having an intermediate version that runs on 3.3 but relies on ST4 features?

Unlikely. We haven't added new features in a while and there hasn't been a high demand either. I say we break compatibility as soon as we see a good reason to do so and then only apply bugfixes to the last minor release branch that supports ST3 & 3.3.

That is of course assuming that we get momentum towards and a base for ~~dependencies~~libraries in 3.8, because there would be no reason for us to abandon 3.3 if 3.8 isn't usable.

FichteFoll avatar Apr 04 '21 19:04 FichteFoll