Dmitry Dygalo

@Lakitna I think I made a mistake in 24181883d519edbbbf9e4648830d86e75ea341be when tried to optimize header generation. It removes filtering more cases than it should - it should fallback to filtering. Could...

@hoog1511 thanks!

@hoog1511 Thank you, it confirms, that the root cause is [this commit](https://github.com/schemathesis/schemathesis/commit/24181883d519edbbbf9e4648830d86e75ea341be). It should be relatively easy to fix, I'll work on this today/tomorrow

FYI, the fix for the recent issue is released in 3.11

Thanks for reporting! Indeed, it is a limitation I'd be happy to lift off - I was planning to revise the example generation code, so it would be definitely within...

Hello George, Thank you for asking! :) At the moment there is no built-in way to shortcut this process. You could do something like this, to generate multiple test functions...

> I tried it, and it has a syntax error ;) Oh, I forgot that it is Python 3.9+ version only. You are exactly right about the version you provided....

There is a fundamental difference between how Hypothesis and pytest work, and many quirks come from there (see https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/916 for details). Hypothesis implies a feedback loop between generated samples and...

> Also it could use the stateful variant by default. Could be, yep. Or at least there could be an argument to they hypothetical `schemathesis.parametrize` that controls this behavior

> Maybe I am wrong, but as I see schemathesis does not need so deep integration, because it has just a very specific target, the APIs. > So it would...