Dmitry Dygalo

Closing in favour of https://github.com/Stranger6667/jsonschema-rs/discussions/475

I think that the CLI design was not well-thought from my side and it led to some underlying complexity which does not leave enough room for unambiguous schema loading. Anyway,...

The project uses a specific commit from that repo via a git submodule. `git submodule init` and `git submodule update` should do the trick, but I guess the project will...

There is already a meta schema that does exactly this. I.e. you can use any of [those](https://github.com/Stranger6667/jsonschema-rs/tree/master/jsonschema/meta_schemas) to validate JSON Schemas. Internally, `jsonschema` contains such meta-validators [here](https://github.com/Stranger6667/jsonschema-rs/blob/master/jsonschema/src/compilation/options.rs#L166) but they are...

We need to update the string definitions to accommodate changes from Python 3.12 - https://github.com/Stranger6667/jsonschema-rs/blob/master/bindings/python/src/string.rs Or, better, reuse some definitions from PyO3. Similar [changes](https://github.com/ijl/orjson/commit/3d290cbb9c269304ebd7bdbd52399ccc091b8ba8#diff-ea475e7b2468611c4595d9253fd111eec5ee718f289a0e47a3d85eef1004adb2) in orjson

Sorry for the delay, with the current approach, it is a bit complicated as annotations are bound to the schema. Not sure if it would be possible to keep the...

Sorry for the delay - the fix will be released soon

Thank you for reporting it and sorry for the delay. An important note is that it only happens on Python 3.12 as far as I can tell

Thank you for opening this issue! I was thinking about it and the main concern was the name clash with ‘schemars’, so I put all the renaming things aside. However,...

Hm, the test is passing