[Feature] add mann_whitney_u_test aggregate function

[jixxiong]

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

feat #45513

What type of PR is this:

• [ ] BugFix
• [x] Feature
• [ ] Enhancement
• [ ] Refactor
• [ ] UT
• [ ] Doc
• [ ] Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• [ ] Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• [x] No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• [ ] Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• [ ] Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• [ ] Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• [ ] Feature removed
• [ ] Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• [x] I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• [x] This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • [x] I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• [ ] This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• [ ] I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • [ ] 3.3
  • [ ] 3.2
  • [ ] 3.1
  • [ ] 3.0
  • [ ] 2.5

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[imay]

@jixxiong thanks very much for this contribution. Could you create a GitHub issue to track this function, and relate this PR to that issue? And we will discuss this function in that issue ticket, like the background of this function, the behavior, and the limitations etc.

[jixxiong]

@jixxiong thanks very much for this contribution. Could you create a GitHub issue to track this function, and relate this PR to that issue? And we will discuss this function in that issue ticket, like the background of this function, the behavior, and the limitations etc.

I'm glad I could help. I have created a GitHub issue to track this function and linked it to this PR. You can find the issue #45513.

[jixxiong]

Great Job! Thx for your great job.

LGTM. You may add some docs about using this function later.

Just some little comments.

Thanks for your advise, I have added some docs in the commit @commit dafb0a7d07f53491991595e584136e6216e37ed3.

[andyziye]

@Mergify rebase

[mergify[bot]]

rebase

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

[jixxiong]

@mergify rebase

[mergify[bot]]

rebase

❌ Command disallowed due to command restrictions in the Mergify configuration.

• [ ] any of:
  • [ ] sender-permission>=read
  • [ ] sender=github-actions[bot]

[jixxiong]

@mergify rebase

[mergify[bot]]

rebase

❌ Command disallowed due to command restrictions in the Mergify configuration.

• [ ] any of:
  • [ ] sender-permission>=read
  • [ ] sender=github-actions[bot]

[LiShuMing]

@mergify rebase

[mergify[bot]]

rebase

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

[sonarqubecloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[github-actions[bot]]

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

:white_check_mark: pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

[github-actions[bot]]

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

:x: fail : 8 / 280 (02.86%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
:large_blue_circle:	be/src/exprs/agg/helpers/serialize_helpers.hpp	0	46	00.00%	[36, 38, 39, 43, 45, 46, 50, 51, 55, 56, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 89, 151, 152, 153, 155, 158, 159, 160, 172, 173, 174, 175, 181, 182, 183, 184, 233, 237, 242, 243, 245, 250, 251, 253, 255]
:large_blue_circle:	be/src/exprs/agg/hypothesis_testing_common.h	0	13	00.00%	[34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 48, 55, 57]
:large_blue_circle:	be/src/exprs/agg/mann_whitney.h	1	206	00.49%	[40, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 50, 52, 53, 54, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 82, 83, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 116, 117, 119, 120, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130, 131, 132, 137, 139, 140, 143, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 152, 153, 154, 155, 157, 158, 160, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 171, 172, 173, 175, 178, 179, 180, 181, 189, 190, 191, 192, 194, 196, 199, 212, 214, 217, 220, 222, 223, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 234, 235, 237, 238, 240, 241, 242, 246, 249, 251, 252, 253, 255, 256, 257, 259, 260, 263, 264, 265, 267, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 277, 278, 279, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 293, 294, 295, 296, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 304, 306, 307, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 320, 321, 323, 324, 326, 327, 328, 332, 333, 334, 336, 337, 338, 340, 341, 342, 344, 345, 348, 349, 352]
:large_blue_circle:	be/src/exprs/function_helper.h	0	8	00.00%	[46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54]
:large_blue_circle:	be/src/exprs/agg/factory/aggregate_resolver_hypothesis_testing.cpp	4	4	100.00%	[]
:large_blue_circle:	be/src/exprs/agg/factory/aggregate_factory.hpp	2	2	100.00%	[]
:large_blue_circle:	be/src/exprs/agg/factory/aggregate_factory.cpp	1	1	100.00%	[]

[github-actions[bot]]

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

:white_check_mark: pass : 22 / 23 (95.65%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
:large_blue_circle:	com/starrocks/sql/analyzer/FunctionAnalyzer.java	14	15	93.33%	[540]
:large_blue_circle:	com/starrocks/catalog/FunctionSet.java	8	8	100.00%	[]