Christoph Honal

In response to https://github.com/InfiniTimeOrg/InfiniTime/pull/1051#issuecomment-1159796455 : Personally, I do not use any of these targets. I invoke `nrfjprog` manually or via scripts (see https://github.com/StarGate01/p8b-infinitime/tree/master/scripts ). I can see how the targets...

The simulator fails to build because the signature of the constructor `Pinetime::System::SystemTask::SystemTask` was changed, it now expects a `Pinetime::Drivers::AccelerationSensor` instead of `Pinetime::Drivers::Bma421`. Should I open a PR in InfiniSim?

Ok, I moved the FIFO changes for the BMA421 to #1145 .

@JF002 I like the idea of reducing `#ifdefs`. I used them because they require minimal changes to the code and classes, but I agree that they kind of break the...

@JF002 regarding encapsulation, what do you think of the approach of #1132 ? There I split the implementations of the device-specific drivers into two specifications of an abstract class. That...

Great work! Are thate any updates on the progress of this PR? have the changes since been merged into main?

The issue has been resolved in version 6.0 . Thank you for your efforts!

Hi @d-vogel that sounds like an interesting project! My PRs here are a bit old, but I plan to update them to the latest release eventually. If you need tips...

Ah, that's nice to hear. Is it possible to use the WSL version of `ocp-indent`? I cant find a configuration option for its path like for `ocamlmerlin` etc: ``` "reason.path.ocamlmerlin":...

Great work! The 0.16 update added a lot of functionality I was missing. > Remove the TK UI, not fully implemented yet The `--remote` works great for me, without any...