feature request: Please provide aarch64/arm64 builds for future releases as well

[m-ueberall]

It would be nice to be able to directly download an *_arm64.deb package.

[tlimoncelli]

Sounds good!

I don't have access to a arm64 deb machine. Would you consider writing a PR to implement this?

[m-ueberall]

I've submitted PR #1259. (TBH, I have absolutely no idea how to add additional labels to strategy.matrix in conjunction with runs-on in order to adapt to individual environments with different sets of registered runners—for testing purposes, I only registered two local ones—but maybe it works as is or someone else is able to figure this out.)

[m-ueberall]

Given that it's likely overkill to use multiple, native runners for a Go binary (that is, unless you intend to run integration tests in native environments), I've submitted PR #1260.

[peerau]

Sounds good!

I don't have access to a arm64 deb machine. Would you consider writing a PR to implement this?

Would you like one? I'm currently stuck without CI/CD on my personal gitlab as it's runners are arm based. :)

[tlimoncelli]

Sure!

[peerau]

Sure!

~~hit up https://fossho.st/apply :D~~ belay that, email me instead

[tlimoncelli]

FYI: We'll be moving this to CircleCI between now and July, hopefully sooner. Adjust the amount of effort you put into this accordingly. (I assume this is a simple eddit to dnscontrol/.github/workflows/release.yml )

[peerau]

FYI: We'll be moving this to CircleCI between now and July, hopefully sooner. Adjust the amount of effort you put into this accordingly. (I assume this is a simple eddit to dnscontrol/.github/workflows/release.yml )

I can supply GH Runners, GL, runners and CircleCI runners on ARM64, no problem. email me at [email protected] and we can work something out

[tlimoncelli]

I believe this is fixed. Please re-open this issue if it isn't.