UpdatedPharoByExample
UpdatedPharoByExample copied to clipboard
Fix/standardized all references to menu items
What's the consensus on how to indicate menu items (let's say, the right-click menu) in Pillar? In LaTeX, there was a specific menu item tag.
Throughout the book, I've been styling menu items the same as inline classes and methods, like ==Accept it==
.
I've also seen bold being used to denote menu items, like ""Accept it""
, which I can also see arguments for.
Preferences?
Dmitri Zagidulin [email protected] writes:
What's the consensus on how to indicate menu items (let's say, the right-click menu) in Pillar? In LaTeX, there was a specific menu item tag. Throughout the book, I've been styling menu items the same as inline classes and methods, like
==Accept it==
. I've also seen bold being used to denote menu items, like""Accept it""
, which I can also see arguments for.
I think we should use ==Item== everywhere. Nothing else.
Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
Sounds good to me.
Consensus is to use the code font Pillar syntax for referencing menu items in the book. To do:
- Change bold markup for menu items, like ``""Accept it""
to monospace,
==Accept it==`. - Fix the capitalization, globally. Our menu items are capitalized, that is,
==Do it==
instead of==do it==
.