Pavel Korytov

I had the same problem trying to launch DAViCal & CardDavMATE on different servers. I hope there is solution other that hosting client & server (DAViCal) at one place

Nice idea. I see gnus has this logic more or less abstracted, maybe I'll try to reuse that. Added this to my enhancements list for whenever I can take it...

`query` uses tags from `elfeed-feeds`, and it returns feeds rather than individual entries. E.g. ```lisp (("http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index/" news tech) ("https://my-instance-of-rss-bridge.com/?action=display&bridge=BleepingComputer&format=Atom" news tech)) ``` `(query . (and tech))` will return these two....

> can I nest searches? What do you mean by nesting? You can use the full [elfeed filter syntax](https://github.com/skeeto/elfeed#filter-syntax) in `:filter`. It isn't too expressive, but at least queries with...

> I want to nest one search into another to avoid to have some searches for some tags double So, basically make all the child searches inherit some parameters from...

So, in a syntax like that ```lisp (group (:title . "Software Development") (:elements (search (:filter . "@6-months-ago +dev") (:title . "Software development")) (group (:title . "C++") (:elements (search (:filter ....

Adding that to the list of enhancements, provided that I understood your idea correctly. I've remembered that I wanted to have a bit more complex logic around elfeed searches, so...

> That doesn't seem to work for me That was meant to be :) Fixed in https://github.com/SqrtMinusOne/elfeed-summary/commit/125e0f059d9f186efa2a04e317b59245963d6f11. > That is my attempt to add such a thing so far Just...

I fixed this like that: ```lisp (defun my/code-review-comment-quit () "Quit the comment window." (interactive) (magit-mode-quit-window t) (with-current-buffer (get-buffer code-review-buffer-name) (goto-char code-review-comment-cursor-pos) (code-review-comment-reset-global-vars))) (with-eval-after-load 'code-review (advice-add #'code-review-comment-quit :override #'my/code-review-comment-quit)) ``` That...

I think it should be up to the user to decide, but I wouldn't say the current solution is strictly wrong. Feel free to make a PR if you want....