SpotlightKid
Issues when using ftplib on ESP32 together with Micropython's built-in "requests" module
I tested micropython-ftplib with Micropython on my ESP32 and it works well. That is the good News.
I found ftplib is incompatible to Micropython's intrinsic library requests for ESP32. I have Micropython v1.24.1 installed via Thonny IDE.
It's a pitty.
My Micropython code is like this:
import network # This library provides WLAN
from ftplib import FTP as FTP # FTP Client from github.com/SpotlightKid
import requests as requests # This library belongs to Micropython and carries out GET requests in the HTTP protocol.
... setup_WLAN() ...
response = requests.get('https://s18.myenergi.net/cgi-jstatus-*', headers = {'User-Agent': '...'}, auth = None, timeout=20)
As soon as ftplib is imported, requests.get fails to access the internet and after timeout it returns the error [Errno 116] ETIMEDOUT.
This incompatibility occures both with ftplib.py and esp/ftplib.py
By the way, in ftplib.py, line 353, fix the bug by changing b'\n' to '\n'.
By the way, in ftplib.py, line 353, fix the bug by changing
b'\n'to'\n'.
Fixed in 82f32b45f613057669c647c0a385b60d17de7914.
As soon as
ftplibis imported,requests.getfails to access the internet and after timeout it returns the error[Errno 116] ETIMEDOUT.
I can't reproduce that. Maybe this is a memory issue? Have you tried compiling the ftplib modules with mpy and installing those instead of the .py files (see the provided install scripts)?
Dear SpitlightKid,
your hint is right. First, I learned to install and operate the compiler mpy-cross. Then I converted ftplib.py to ftplib.mpy. Now my problem changed. Now the error message doesn't stop the 1st HTTP-request of my script. Now 3 times of HTTP-requests succeed and the error appears at the 4th time.
I was wrong, when I said ftplib to be incompatible to Micropython's request. Instead, the RAM in my ESP32 is used up. Maybe you can recommend me some quick tutorials in English or German on monitoring the different parts of RAM and on garbage collection. The next weeks or months, I'll go on compiling libraries and I'll compare the RAM consumption of Micropython's requests library with SpotlightKid/mrequests. The latter economically uses one socket class both for FTP and for HTTP-requests.
With the ESP32, I actually just wanted to quickly compare the electricity consumption of my private home with the so-called green electricity index "Grünstromindex". This is a public computer calculation that shows live, when in Germany the power generation is from renewables and where the power lines are jammed. This goal is now a long way into the future.
That still leaves the question, which of the module you use apparently leaks memory.
If you like, you can try my mrequests module as a replacement for the built-in "requests". I don't guarantee that it will solve your problems, but you can give it a try.
Please note that I am not really involved with development for MicroPython anymore, since I don't currently have much use for it anymore. Tbh, I don't even know what is the best place to get help about Micropython development these days, since the forum closed.
Hi
Do you solve the FTP problems?
If am developing a set of micro services for micros: uRPC https://saltlake71.eu/
There is already the possibility to send data from the micro to this server, which converts the data and sends it via email: https://saltlake71.eu/email.html
Other possible solutions with uRPC: save the data to a KV store and read as Json; save the data on a Google spreadsheet.
Eventually I can add the feature to send the data by FTP.
Ciao Massimo
