SpacingBat3

> So if I understand it correctly, you dismiss the idea of packaging as a flatpak because npm doesn't work directly in the flatpak building process? Completely ignoring the fact...

> > [...] I'd also be down to maintain the flatpak on flathub, if that's ok with you > > _-- @axtloss, [#116 (comment)](https://github.com/SpacingBat3/WebCord/issues/116#issuecomment-1140500714)_ > > @SpacingBat3 what are your...

> > Why not? If someone wants to host a WebCord on Flathub by themselves, they can do it without my prior confirmation. > > I just thought I'd ask...

> @SpacingBat3 how would you prefer to be credited, on flathub? You can just add a link to my repo as a homepage/source repository. I believe Flatpaks supports long descriptions,...

> It only supports a short phrase, and has tag name of so I'm not too sure how to credit you there in a way that's acceptable. That's why I'm...

I've added Electron Forge Flatpak maker until I won't develop a better ones on my side, so simple Flatpaks will be distributed in WebCord `v3.4.0` releases. Probably they will lack...

Unfortunately, flatpaks still needs to be delayed in GitHub actions, but at least they can be enabled for the individuals that wish to try building them on their own with...

Oh, I see what's the problem... However, I'm unsure if it wouldn't be too confusing to add it there – this popup is displayed for the security reasons, so malicious...

Well, you might need to write your own then... Of course, your license might be based on the other... Just find the one that is the closest to your needs......

> Wouldn't this sort of license be like an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike? (CC BY-NC-SA) @BlueJYT Do you propose to license the software with the Creative Commons licese? Just read this: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/777/why-shouldnt-creative-commons-licenses-be-used-for-software CC...