Michael Förderer

Results 489 comments of Michael Förderer

Closing because of no response. Please reopen if problem still exists.

> Thanks for your reply. The problem is not about Cygwin. I can reproduce it in MinGW. The problem is that the version of gcov delivered with Cygwin is always...

@sebastianraizer Where you able to verify the issue with the master branch?

@sebastianraizer Please can you check the branch of the liked PR?

Thanks for finding the fix. Can you raise a pull request for this?

Such a compare can be done on the base of the JSON as described in https://github.com/gcovr/gcovr/issues/507#issuecomment-892085588. Creating a HTML report out of this is a quite big effort.

As mentioned in #681 the parsing depends on the format and is experimental. After looking at the test data complex for loops are not checkable.

Only two branches (one logical expression) are supported in for loops.

From CHANGELOG: ```rst Can report decision coverage with :option:`--decisions` option (reasonably formatted C/C++ source files only, HTML and JSON output) (:issue:`350`) ``` Unfortunately, it's not documented what "reasonably" means.