ghost43

Several years ago, before version 2.0, Electrum supported this (importing individual privkeys to a seeded wallet). It was removed as too many newbies shot themselves in the foot. People did...

For example, consider creating a local tx that spends all UTXOs in the wallet, and consolidates them to another ismine address. Such a tx basically does not change what `wallet.get_balance()`...

> i made a BIP39 seed but you don't accept it and i don't know how to generate a valid electrum seed. You can use a BIP39 seed if you...

> allow generating mnemonics that are verifiably immune to false randomness from a backdoored CPU What do you mean by "verifiably"? If the code naively mixes in custom entropy, you...

Ok, I think it would be perfectly reasonable to allow that. Unlike the option that existed in the past, which allowed the user to mix in their own entropy and...

Looks like user set `config.WALLET_BATCH_RBF=True`, and `wallet.get_unconfirmed_base_tx_for_batching()` selected a base_tx to merge with, but we cannot calculate `base_tx.get_fee()` for it... Not sure how this can happen. https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/fe03fbf2a05bcbe7ddb263d937ad9501b929d8a4/electrum/wallet.py#L1872

Note: naively RBF-ing a tx (in a way the changes the input set) that pays to a silent payment address will ~burn the coins. This means that when having the...

It's not just mpp_split. When `lnworker.create_route_for_payment` is called, in the non-mpp case, the channel chosen by mpp_split is not even passed. https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/307cf25fd415c3d83139118c93d16f6e2e46b6db/electrum/lnworker.py#L1875 A comment would be nice to explain the...

There is another example of this in https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/8830, with more details there

similar in principle: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/7944