awesome-flutter
awesome-flutter copied to clipboard
Solido
Add link to Code With Andrea website (Flutter tutorials)
Description
CodeWithAndrea.com contains a growing collection of over 50 free videos, articles and tips about Flutter app development.
Checklist
- [x] I read How to contribute
- [x] I edited the SOURCE.md file only
@renancaraujo @rodydavis @orestesgaolin @jogboms
First time we need to deal with such a case:
Free content is used to drive traffic that eventually transform to a sell on this page https://codewithandrea.com/courses/
Putting this on top of the list is like redirecting traffic for business but there's some interesting content too.
What's your idea ? Should we create an explicit section ?
To clarify, I regularly post free Flutter tutorials (articles and videos).
At the end of my pages there are cards where students can view my paid courses if they wish to do so.
Alternatively, I could open a PR to include a link to my YouTube channel.
This includes all my free videos. People can indirectly find my website from there, but the paid content is much less prominent.
Would that be more suitable?
I think it is fine free YouTube channel could be added, but we could also add a paid content section too! 🤔
The name "paid content" kind of implies that all the content is paid. Many instructors have websites with a mix of free and paid content - not sure what would be the best way to categorize this.
I'll open a separate PR for my YouTube channel.
I quite agree with @rodydavis on the tagging. It contains amazing free content. Maybe a tag indicating possible paid content.
Related: I've now opened a separate PR for my YouTube channel:
https://github.com/Solido/awesome-flutter/pull/722
@rodydavis @Solido re. website, how would you like to move forward?
Thanks :)
IMO we should move forward with https://codewithandrea.com/articles/ (since that section is supposed to be for blogs and the channel has been included via #722) regardless of the 'courses' link. It only would be considered a "paid product" only if the articles were under a paywall or some kind of free trial.
Bottom line: It should go, IMO.
@renancaraujo That sounds like a good idea. I rebased and amended my PR to point to the articles page.
@rodydavis @renancaraujo @jogboms @Solido I'm not sure if anyone has noticed, but content from merged PRs doesn't seem to appear in the main README (Example: #722). Perhaps some build pipeline is no longer working?
Also would be nice to merge this PR. 😉