>100% overhangs and bridging speeds should be separate
Is there an existing issue for this feature request?
- [X] I have searched the existing issues
Is your feature request related to a problem?
I find it strange that >100% overhang speeds are printed using bridge speeds and there's no way to specify its own speed, noticed when printing overhang tests. Bridge speeds often can be faster because of end point anchors, infact the default settings have the speeds higher, but if you want to print something like the image, it doesn't make sense for the nozzle to slow down and then speed up for the steepest part of the overhang
Which printers will be beneficial to this feature?
All
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be nice and probably very easy to separate the speed settings for >100% overhang and bridges
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
Hi. Check:
https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/issues/5788#issuecomment-2182741408
@tome9111991
Seems to be more or less fixed (intentionally) with the "slow down for curled perimeters" turned off.
But it still feels like a compromise...
My concept would be introduce a new additional overhang speed option -> 99.5-100% or something like that. And use that for setting "real" bridge speeds. Maybe it could be a complete replacement of bridge speed / bridge fan speed.
slow down on
slow down off
So it still feels like a compromise, because you sacrifice the slowest (and probably most effective) deceleration on real overhangs.
best regards, freakyDude
Orca bot: this issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity.
Bumping since overhang/bridge overlap is still an issue
Orca bot: this issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity.
Wouldn't be stale if it wasn't just the same issue enduring forever without any fix or notice of a fix. I'd be happy if we could just "paint" bridging like we can "paint" supports.