René

@pekkaklarck Let's please talk together with @aaltat and @xylix about how this can be a smooth transition for users. We use $password in Browser

Is there any demand? I find that "unclean" from a business/best-practives point of view. And i would not put any effort into it.

I would like to reopen. I think compound keywords are just more descriptive. I missed the discussion… 😞

The ISO 29119-5 does name them `composite keywords` and `simple keywords` I do not like the `simple` and in German I do prefer `atomic keywords` as a phrase for those...

I thing the language model has a pretty good point here. quote: In the context of keyword-driven testing, it's important to choose terms that are clear, intuitive, and reflective of...

Choosing between "Composite" and "Compound" involves subtle nuances in meaning and connotation: **Composite vs. Compound:** - **Composite:** This term suggests a structure made from multiple distinct elements, each retaining its...

@JFoederer I understand your opinion, but i do not fully agree. Library keywords do not need to be any technical. It is just the "lower" end of the Keyword Levels....

The situation here is, that Robot Framework in general interprets any key=value pattern as a named argument, when there are **kwargs present. This is the case with `Format String` Example...

When this is implemented we should probably fix the following situation: https://robotframework.slack.com/archives/C0K0240NL/p1708297275219929?thread_ts=1708253100.376219&cid=C0K0240NL ```python resources = BuiltIn()._namespace._kw_store.resources._items kws = [ KeywordDocBuilder().build_keywords(resource) for resource in resources] ``` When calling that on a...

This could cause incompatibility PythonLibCore. If the module level class that has the same name but has no @library decorator. Should be checked really carefully if this introduces backwards incompatibility.