On same deadline, items queued first have priority

[amcandio]

When multiple are registered at the same time, those registered first should have priority to make scheduling behavior easier to predict. I don't think this should be added as documented behavior to prevent users from depending on it.

Once nice to have follow up would be to start supporting custom prioritization as tie-breaker so users can define their own to handle tie-breaking. Right now users depend on tweaking expire timestamps to get same effect, which is not clean.

[notgull]

@amcandio Please rebase on master to fix the CI

[amcandio]

@notgull rebased!

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 86.22%. Comparing base (5ba1370) to head (10465dc).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #205      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.44%   86.22%   +0.77%     
==========================================
  Files          13       15       +2     
  Lines        1876     2069     +193     
==========================================
+ Hits         1603     1784     +181     
- Misses        273      285      +12     

Flag	Coverage Δ
macos-latest	85.50% <100.00%> (?)
ubuntu-latest	85.82% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[amcandio]

@notgull any update on this?

[amcandio]

@notgull apologies for the delay! Please let me know if further changes are needed

[amcandio]

Hi! Any chance we can ship this one? Not super important but I have this old tech debt item that I could close with this feature!