Samael
Samael
worth noting that this is with all dmd versions since 2.094 and also affects vibe-core 1.22.0: ``` C:\Users\runneradmin\AppData\Local\dub\packages\vibe-core-1.22.0\vibe-core\source\vibe\core\process.d(608,28): Error: `@safe` function `vibe.core.process.pipe` cannot call `@system` function `core.stdc.stdio._handleToFD!()._handleToFD` C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\dc\dmd-2.098.1\x64\dmd2\windows\bin64\..\..\src\druntime\import\core\stdc\stdio.d(1876,9): `core.stdc.stdio._handleToFD!()._handleToFD` is...
This problem remains on vibe-core 1.22.4 see example build log: https://github.com/buggins/ddbc/runs/6684795912?check_suite_focus=true ``` taggedalgebraic 0.11.22: building configuration "library"... eventcore 0.9.20: building configuration "winapi"... stdx-allocator 2.77.5: building configuration "library"... vibe-core 1.22.4: building...
I'm happy with that. I'll amend the PR
looks like all the jobs passed https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe-core/pull/306/checks, can this be merged?
I'm seeing same errors in dmd-2.085.1 on Ubuntu with vibe-core-1.18.0: ``` taggedalgebraic 0.11.22: building configuration "library"... eventcore 0.9.14: building configuration "epoll"... stdx-allocator 2.77.5: building configuration "library"... vibe-core 1.18.0: building configuration...
[ddbc v0.3.8](https://github.com/buggins/ddbc/releases/tag/v0.3.8) is also effected by this. Other packages have managed to get updated within the last few hours though. Am I right in thinking that github repos are scanned...
this sounds good. I work on both ddbc and hibernated but did not create the repo and cannot do any of the maintenance from code.dlang.org side of things. If we...
This is still a problem when running _check_ on the latest dependency-check-maven 7.0.1: ``` WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.fasterxml.jackson.module.afterburner.util.MyClassLoader (file:/C:/Users/USERNAME/.m2/repository/com/fasterxml/jackson/module/jackson-module-afterburner/2.13.2/jackson-module-afterburner-2.13.2.jar) to...
2.097 and above is still better than 2.099 and above. Probably worth just going with that and putting ``` frontend=">=2.097" ``` In the dub.sdl
Hi @nlhnt sorry for the long delay in looking at this. I've just started looking at the mssql support in ddbc and found that the way additional parameters are handled...