Simon Biggs

I haven't even begun implementing the new names. Just thinking about it at the moment. I personally do like the section word. Maybe if it's not broke don't fix it?...

To play devils advocate the "section" helps indicate where that element needs to be placed. It helps indicate that it needs to go around the code blocks. "Trigger" doesn't give...

@robmarkcole Here's another thought. Go back to just ``, ``, and ``. Remove filechange and output. And instead have a trigger parameter on ``. The trigger parameter on the live...

or what if the parameter was instead `addTriggers` which indicated that it would always keep the `content` but could have others included. And make it so that the `addTriggers` parameter...

Hmm, different word altogether. Inspired by RxJS (http://reactivex.io/documentation/operators/subscribe.html) What about: * `` * `` * `` * `` * `` * `` * `` And finally * `` This is...

Woo hoo! :) we have a winner! Okay, back up a sec, why do you like it? (I don't want to race ahead with the idea unless we're sure that...

I envisage usage of the above observe elements to look like the following: ~~~html ```python file_names = ['a_file_name.csv', 'another_file_name.py'] x = 1 y = 2 def a_function(): return x +...

@OxygenLithium do you have any preferences/ideas/recommendations regarding https://github.com/SimonBiggs/scriptedforms/issues/247#issuecomment-384922733 and https://github.com/SimonBiggs/scriptedforms/issues/247#issuecomment-384926107

I think I have managed to convince myself. Managing to convince you @robmarkcole so quickly probably helped sell the idea to myself.

So, unless there are any objections I will begin implementing this formalism in parallel. The old method will hang around. Once the new method is complete the old method will...